Plain language summary
Prostate cancer is a leading cancer in men from the United Kingdom. Diet and exercise are recommended for men with prostate cancer however, few achieve the recommendations. Psychological and behavioural factors are often responsible for the lack of change and this qualitative study aimed to determine the most common, with a view to helping individuals to affect change. The results showed that several men believed that diet and physical activity had no association with cancer and those who did, maintained a healthy diet and took regular exercise. Most men thought they had a good diet before diagnosis, however evidence for this was mixed. Barriers to change were plentiful and included physical inability, taste of food, and side effects of supplements. It was concluded that behaviour change models could help with adherence to a better diet and exercise regime. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that it may not be enough to simply recommend diet and exercise to men with prostate cancer. Support and guidance may also be needed.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Interventions designed to improve men's diet and physical activity (PA) have been recommended as methods of cancer prevention. However, little is known about specific factors that support men's adherence to these health behaviour changes, which could inform theory-led diet and PA interventions. We aimed to explore these factors in men following prostatectomy for prostate cancer (PCa). DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS A qualitative study using semistructured interviews with men, who made changes to their diet and/or PA as part of a factorial randomised controlled trial conducted at a single hospital in South West England. Participants were 17 men aged 66 years, diagnosed with localised PCa and underwent prostatectomy. Interview transcripts underwent thematic analysis. RESULTS Men were ambivalent about the relationship of nutrition and PA with PCa risk. They believed their diet and level of PA were reasonable before being randomised to their interventions. Men identified several barriers and facilitators to performing these new behaviours. Barriers included tolerance to dietary changes, PA limitations and external obstacles. Facilitators included partner involvement in diet, habit formation and brisk walking as an individual activity. Men discussed positive effects associated with brisk walking, such as feeling healthier, but not with nutrition interventions. CONCLUSIONS The facilitators to behaviour change suggest that adherence to trial interventions can be supported using well-established behaviour change models. Future studies may benefit from theory-based interventions to support adherence to diet and PA behaviour changes in men diagnosed with PCa.
Methodological quality
Jadad score
:
Not applicable
Allocation concealment
:
Not applicable
